If you believe that two wrongs don’t make a right, then explain how -1(-1) = +1?

http://twitter.com/#!/kingjames - The Greater Man upstairs know when it’s my time.  Right now isn’t the time.

I agree with Lebron 100% here.   The supernatural creator and overseer of the universe knows exactly when LeBron will score more basketball baskets than the other sports team he is playing.  The dude practically makes the lines in Vegas.

All the people that were rooting on me to fail, at the end of the day they have to wake up tomorrow and have the same life that they had before they woke up today. They have the same personal problems they had today. I’m going to continue to live the way I want to live and continue to do the things that I want to do with me and my family and be happy with that. So they can get a few days or a few months or whatever the case may be on being happy about not only myself, but the Miami Heat not accomplishing their goal. But they got to get back to the real world at some point.

~LeBron in press conference after the game

Someone needed to say it.  Probably the best thing he could have said here.  Not good for PR, but a perfect slap in the face to NBA fans.  And that’s what he was going for.

Lost - Lauren Spierer

Lost - Morgan Johnson

Examiner.com – Have you ever heard of Morgan Johnson?  Probably not.  He went missing on May 18th in Plainfield, Indiana.  There have only been a handful of stories in the local news about Johnson’s disappearance.  However stories regarding missing Indiana student Lauren Spierer have received national news coverage.   I feel for the family of Spierer, but what about all the other people who have disappeared?

Polly Klaas, Chandra Levy, Elizabeth Smart, Natalee Hollway; the list just goes on and on.  When good looking people go missing it sparks public interest.  I will go out on a limb and say this is the most shallow & fucked up phenomenon in America.  Every day over 2,000 people in their early twenties are reported missing.  Yet there are 30,000 people on Facebook who “like” Lauren Spierer’s disappearance.  I don’t think it is cute, cool, or noble to publicly care about Lauren Sperier.  I think it just flags you as a lunatic with emotional problems.

On Twitter, celebrities including Ryan Seacrest, Scott Baio and Kim Kardashian sent notes to their followers about the search.  Wow, Ryan Secrest is so caring, he tweeted about Lauren!!!  OMG!!!

Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay Tweeted a $10,000 reward for “serious info that SOLVES Lauren’s Missing Persons.”  Why not a $10,000 reward for Morgan Johnson?  If Lauren had crooked teeth would he have cared?

I commend her friends and family for getting the word out about her disappearance; but I want to sucker punch everyone who pretends to give a fuck.  Check out some of the vomit on this page: [vomity facebook page].  So shallow it would make a goldfish drown.

Links to http://twitter.com/#!/kingjames

I know, I know; fuck me.  LeBron’s a douche/scumbag/etc/etc.  Maybe it’s because I don’t follow hoops as closely as your blue collar transit worker in Cleveland; but I kind of feel bad for LeBron.  He is so inside of his own head right now that he got <meta> tags tattooed on his temples.  NERD JOOOOKE!

Plus he’s so goddamn easy to make fun of.  Look at his Twitter post before the game last night.  Look at his Twitter picture. He calls himself King James for fuck’s sake.  Nothing good can come out of that.  I actually believe that if he removed the ‘King’ from his name people wouldn’t hate him as much.  He should change it to Jumping James.  People would be all like, “Yo, don’t make fun of Jumpin’ James, he’s just having an off night.”

In the world of washers & dryers, racial discrimination is king.  Whites and blacks must remain segregated or else there will be tons of bleeding.  With that said, how the fuck do 3/4 tees do it?  You have the blackest of blacks, coexisting with the whitest of whites, yet no blood is shed.  Which group do these tolerant tees mingle with?  The whites or the blacks?  I throw them in the mix with the Aryan Union because I figure if the black sleeves don’t stain the white portion, then the black sleeves must not bleed.  But then on the other hand, maybe the white portion is treated with some special spray that makes it unaffected by the blacks?

I think it’s the former.  That the sleeves are hit with a special dye that doesn’t bleed into the white.  So then why don’t they use this dye on all colored clothing.  Do you know the money and energy we waste as a country by doing (2) separate loads?  I’m not in the mood for maths, but I’m sure it’s around twice as much as it could be.  I’m tired of all this intolerant clothing.  I swear, I’m one coffee away from starting a clothing company called Tolerant Tees.  All our shirts will be dyed with the shit they use on the sleeves of 3/4 tees.  Not to mention, I can say my company is “green” and use it to guilt trip the mindless into buying my products; muahahha.  That’s fucking smart.

“People would treat the game ‘Marry, Fuck, Kill’ more seriously if it was called ‘Marry, Fuck, Homicide’.”

~Reg

SlutWalkToronto.com - On January 24th, 2011, a representative of the Toronto Police gave shocking insight into the Force’s view of sexual assault by stating: “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized”.

Jokes about female sexuality are not funny, period.  However it’s been very hard for me to avoid dealing with these sluts.  I  think these woman are ovaryacting for sure.  I cliterally don’t understand their point?  A cop states that “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized”, and it eggs everyone on?  In no way is this cop doing these ladies a dis-cervix; if anything he is just stating the obvious.

Put it this way, if I left the top off my jeep overnight, there is a higher chance it will get vandalized than if it was locked and sealed.  If it then got robbed and a cop told me that “you should avoid leaving your top off in order to deter robbery”, I would agree.  Leaving the top off my Jeep makes robbing my car a more attractive opportunity, just like dressing like a slut makes you more likely to get victimized.  Of course it’s a car thief who is robbing my car; and it’s a rapist who is….well…..raping people.  But their actions are provoked, and that’s all this cop is saying.  Go ahead and dress in lingerie, I’ll go ahead and leave my wallet in plain sight within an unlocked car.  Then when we get victimized we can all protest together.  It is extremely naive to think that what you’re wearing, how much alcohol you’ve consumed or how flirtatious you’re being with random strangers does not influence rapes. These things do not justify rapes by any means but you have to be smart enough to deter that type of behavior.

**You know these woman are marching because the feminist movement ended in the early ’90s and they are pathetically scrambling for a purpose to their lives.  Quite ironic if you ask me.  Someone needs to tell them that they missed the boat on the movement.  Women won.

Does anybody truly know why America is at war?  Many liberals think that America is at war for a profit which only benefits a small number of highly influential people.  Conservatives on the other hand think that America is at war to fight terror.  I believe that both sides are misguided.  Since government is driven by money, and money is power, I spent the past several weeks searching for a reason that could economically justify the $1.2 trillion+ price tag of war.  In other words, what is the return on our $1.2 trillion investment?

United States oil production peaked in 1970 and began to decline. By 2005 imports were about twice as great as production.

During the 1973 oil crisis, members of OPEC unreasonably proclaimed an oil embargo on the US.  This embargo was “in response to the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military” during the Yom Kippur War. Since US crude oil imports have eclipsed our production in 1995, America has become exponentially more vulnerable to another one of these irresponsible & irrational price increases by OPEC.  The gap between the production and importation of oil in America continues to widen by the year (see graph above). Since America is not part of OPEC, and OPEC is regulated by OPEC alone; we need to have a military strong hold in the Middle East to prevent abrupt shifts in their policy. Suppose the US didn’t have a military presence abroad, and OPEC suddenly decided to triple the price of a barrel of oil to America, or any other country, how would we stop them?   By blatantly starting a war over oil prices?  That’s diplomatic suicide, not to mention it could end up leading to World War III (NATO V.S. OPEC).  America cannot admit this is the reason we are at war because you cannot go to war over speculation; in this instance speculation over OPEC’s future behavior.  Instead the United States used 9/11 as an excuse to create a strong hold in the Middle East prior to the gap between oil production and importation getting out of control.   We currently consume 15 million barrels of crude oil a day;  6 million of which comes from OPEC. With the price of oil at $100 a barrel, we send $220 billion to OPEC every year. If OPEC decided to arbitrarily quadruple the price of oil, or cut off our supply (which they could easily do without US military presence), we would then send an extra $660 billion over to OPEC every year.  In just (2) years, the amount of money we have spent on war since 2001 ($1.2 trillion+) is justified if it means preventing this price increase.   At the time of the 1973 oil crisis, America was equipped to weather an oil embargo because we were producing more oil than we were importing.  America currently consumes 26% of the world’s energy and uses it to produce 26% of the world’s industrial output; chaotic manipulation of these numbers by OPEC would cripple our economy, especially in a new era where imports are twice as great as production.  Is our military presence abroad ethical?  Fuck no.  But is it a good business decision for the American economy?  YES.  Yes by a long shot, and that’s why we are doing it.

Most liberals believe that America is at war to profit economically; however they also agree that the vast majority of tax payer money vanishes into waste of war.  To explain this contradiction, they assert that all the profits of war go to a handful of connected individuals such as Dick Cheney. Handing connected military contractors such as DynCorp and Fluor $2 billion in annual revenues from the US federal reserve is NOT the reason we went to war.  Yes, the US may have unfairly given specific contracts to companies which should have went out for bid.   And yes, certain CEO’s are profiting unfairly off this war.   But by no means are a hand full of billion dollar contracts the reason we spent $1.2 trillion+ ($1,200 billion) on war over the last 10 years.   Be serious.  The entire market capitalization of Haliburton is $45 billion, which is less than 4% of the $1.2 trillion cost of war.  Obviously there are profiteers in addition to Haliburton, but the gross profits they realize are still small potatoes when stacked up against the $1.2 trillion cost of war.  Do you really think we went to war so the CEOs of a few companies could live in $40 million houses and get smiles of approval at their board meetings?  If you think Cheney’s ties to Haliburton are corrupt, just look at the President of OPEC, Masoud Mir Kazemi. This guy was the head of Iran’s ministry of commerce as recently as 2009. You don’t think he would like to bury our economy and make Iran prosper by simply holding a meeting and raising the global price of crude?  That’s a highly possible scenario if you remove our military from the equation.  Independently, the OPEC members can use their leverage over the world price setting mechanism for oil to stabilize their real incomes by raising world oil prices. They did it during the 1973 oil embargo, so what makes you think they wont do it again? Now look at Abdalla Salem el-Badri, the secretary general of OPEC.  This guy has been Libyan Minister for Oil since 1990.  With that being said, do you really think America cares about democracy for the Libyan people?  We recently intervened in Libya to stop dictator Moammar Khadafy from using genocidal violence to crush a Libyan uprising.  If we going to act as the global genocide police, then why not go into Sudan and arrest President Omar al-Bashir

Sudan President Al-Bashir is the first sitting head of state ever indicted by the ICC as well as the first to be charged with genocide.

on his ICC genocide warrant?  Al-Bashir is the first sitting head of state ever indicted by the ICC, as well as the first to be charged with genocide.  America could care less about Bashir because in January 2005 the Bush administration hashed out a peace agreement giving Southern Sudan independence along with 75% of Sudan’s petroleum production (500,000 barrels/day).  So let me get this straight, we ignore someone officially indicted on genocide charges, and then turn around and attack someone who is not (Khadafy)?  America wants democracy in Libya because under an unchecked autocracy  Khadafy has the power to single-handedly tell the Libyan Minister for Oil, who is the secretary General of OPEC, to withhold OPEC’s supply and jack up the price of crude.  Am I starting to make sense?

OPEC

So how could we solve our dilemma and prevent war?  The easy answer is to set up regulations on OPEC’s pricing policies, but this is not plausible.  OPEC is made up of twelve countries which are individually led by twelve of the most stubborn people on Earth.  Not to mention, regulation hurts any business; just look at what Finra is doing to stock brokerage firms in America.  With that being said, the only solution to this problem is to go to war.  Either that, or lay back and get victimized by an irrational string of unavoidable OPEC policy decisions.  Our government chose the former.  Do I think it is worth the lives lost, no.  But do I think it saved our country, yes.

Los Angeles - Former Super Bowl Most Valuable Player Hines Ward was held at gunpoint by police in Los Angeles on Thursday in a mix-up over a car mistakenly reported stolen, officials said.  The woman had reported the car stolen when a restaurant valet could not find it, and then after it was located she forgot to cancel the police report, police said.

Hines Ward’s date reported her car stolen; and then located it, and forget to report it found.  This girl must be smoking hot.  Probably an 11 out of 10.  Just on fire sexy.

“Is this 911…..I like totally don’t know where my car isssss???  I think maybe someone stole it or something.”